Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Calum Puttergill Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vallejo vs Puttergill analysis and find out who is favored!
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Calum Puttergill Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Vallejo 1 - 0 Puttergill
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vallejo has won 48.26% of points on their second serve, while Puttergill has won 46.41%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vallejo, in recent form, has won 52.97% of their opponent's second serve points, while Puttergill has won 53.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.99% and 33.24% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vallejo has saved 55.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Puttergill has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vallejo has won 55.74% of matches played (W/L 34/ 27), with Puttergill winning 33.33% (W/L 9/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vallejo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 24/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Puttergill has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 38/ 34), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Vallejo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.22% of matches (W/L 21/ 20), where as Puttergill has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 9/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Vallejo winning 1 times and Puttergill being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Vallejo winning 2 and Puttergill winning 0. The last match between Vallejo and Puttergill was at the Salinas Challenger, 24-07-2023, Q3, Hard with Adolfo Daniel Vallejo getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:43.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Vallejo and Puttergill have played a deciding set 0 times, with Vallejo winning 0 times and Puttergill 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Vallejo winning 0, and Puttergill 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vallejo has played against opponents with an average rank of 284.34 while Puttergill has played against players with an average rank of 187.52.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vallejo has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Puttergill has won 30% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vallejo has converted 47.83% of breakpoint opportunities, and Puttergill has converted 54.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
291
Rank
291
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
888
Rank
663
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
55% (72-58)
Career Total W/L
49% (170-174)
57% (16-12)
YTD W/L
38% (3-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Vallejo VS Puttergill H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Adolfo Daniel Vallejo | Calum Puttergill |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:43 | 1:19:43 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (36/54) | 53% (27/51) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (22/36) | 41% (11/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (10/18) | 29% (7/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 54% (7/13) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 65% (33/51) | 41% (22/54) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Vallejo VS Puttergill H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Calum Puttergill
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Adolfo Daniel Vallejo | Calum Puttergill |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (16/12) | 38% (3/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (37/31) | 45% (9/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (333/295) | 47% (82/94) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 43% (3/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 58% (15/11) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0.35 |
| Aces Total | 42 | 30 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 81 | 33 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:6:10 | 1:37:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 296.04 | 129.63 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1379/2125) | 62% (339/548) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (854/1379) | 65% (219/339) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (360/746) | 46% (97/209) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (121/253) | 54% (25/46) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (897/2017) | 41% (227/559) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (9/8) | 38% (3/5) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (15/26) | 38% (3/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 22% (2/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (14/12) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (14/2) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 0% (4/0) |
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
59%
(
61 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
67 of
95)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
49 of
67)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Alexander Klintcharov
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Maxence Beauge
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
0
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Antoni Fabre
53%
(
47 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
33%
(
14 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
49%
(
44 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
100)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 0-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejo Lorenzo Lingua Lavallen
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Karue Sell
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
33%
(
15 of
45)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
49%
(
36 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Calum Puttergill Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Calum Puttergill
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jake Delaney
Player
Calum Puttergill
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Calum Puttergill
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Moerani Bouzige
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Kokoro Isomura
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Harper
Player
Calum Puttergill
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Calum Puttergill
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Preston Brown
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Calum Puttergill
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Vallejo Vs Puttergill Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
